Security vendors have been pressing Microsoft to cooperate on Vista security
McAfee blasts Microsoft's 'hollow security promises'
/v3-uk/news/1963356/mcafee-blasts-microsofts-hollow-security-promises
20 Oct 2006, Tom Sanders in California , V3
Security vendor McAfee no longer has any confidence that Microsoft will cooperate with independent security vendors and allow them to protect the forthcoming Windows Vista operating system.
"Despite pledges, press conferences and speeches by Microsoft, the community of independent security companies that consumers rely on for computer protection has seen little indication that Microsoft intends to live up to the promises it made last week," McAfee attorney Christopher Thomas said in a statement.
"We have been greatly disappointed by the lack of action by the company so far and Microsoft has not lived up, either in detail or in spirit, to the hollow assurances offered by its top management last week."
McAfee's response comes after a failed teleconference scheduled for Thursday morning. Several of the attendees were kicked off the call 15 minutes into the conference, while about a dozen were unable to continue listening.
Microsoft had promised to use the call to disclose how it would allow outside security vendors to work with Windows Vista.
The software giant attributed the failed conference to problems with its Live Meeting software and rescheduled the call.
Security vendors including McAfee and Symantec have been pressing Microsoft to cooperate and have lobbied the European Commission and Korean government to force Microsoft to open up its kernel.
Microsoft said last week that it would make certain unspecified changes to the software, which are expected to prevent anti-trust sanctions.
The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on McAfee's latest complaints.
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2010, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093
Do you agree?
Securoty from Independent Providers is Too Costly
For years now we've been paying through the eyes, ears, nose, mouth and any other available orifices for applications not covered by our Operating Systems. As Windows has grown, we've acquired many of these services at no extra cost.
I for one am grateful to Microsoft for bundling all these extras in with the OS. Before Windows 98 I'd grown sick to death of being held to ransom by lippy nerds if I wanted to send a fax or e-mail, to restore my hard disk, to stop viruses from ruining everything, to secure my privacy or any of the other supplementary task that rightly belong in the OS.
The third parties who offer protection against viruses, malware and intrusion all charge the earth for their services, which very often simply don't work, or at least work patchily and unreliably.
I hope they go the wall!
Posted by J. L. A. Hartley, 20 Oct 2006
McAfee & Norton
The big question is, who gives a s*** about them, they are bad business making bloatwares.
They want the kernel to be open to secure it out but that in the first place would make it less secure.
Posted by David, 22 Oct 2006