.
/v3-uk/news/1961550/microsoft-seeks-source-approval
31 Jul 2007, Tom Sanders in California , V3
Microsoft is preparing to submit its three Shared Source licences to the Open Source Initiative. Approval would render them official open source licences.
The software vendor has released more than 150 applications under its Shared Source licences which allow developers and users varying degrees of access to source code. Some of those projects however are believed to lack credibility because they aren't governed by an official open source licence.
"If the licences are approved, [it] should give the community additional confidence that the code we’re sharing is truly Open Source," Jon Rosenberg, director of Microsoft's Shared Source programme wrote in a blog posting.
Share Source offers three licences. The Microsoft Permissive Licence is the least restrictive of the Microsoft licences, allowing developers to view, modify and distribute source code. They are under no obligation to publish the code.
Microsoft Community Licence aims to promote collaborative projects, allowing developers to view source code, but imposing some restrictions on changes and distribution.
Microsoft Reference Licence is the most restricted of the three, only allowing developers to view source code and study an application's inner workings.
The Open Source Initiative validates candidate licences against the Open source Definition, a set of 10 criteria that includes free redistribution, publication of source code and allowing derived works.
The submission of the Microsoft licences goes against an ongoing effort to reduce the overall number of open source licences. There currently are nearly 60 OSI-approved licences, which is considered an obstacle to the adoption of open source software in the enterprise.
Corporations have to study and approve each licence, as well as determine if two or more licences can be used together. Microsoft and Oracle, for instance, prohibit the mixing of their code with any open source code and impose penalty licence fees on violators. Instead of approving multiple licences, companies often opt to clear just a few open source licences and prohibit the use of all other ones.
Do you agree?
MS + Open Source
MS will NOT get the open source definition it seeks since they ONLY allow Windows programming. NO other OS is allowed!
Open source means OPEN! I couldn't program for UNIX, SOLARIS, MAC OS/OSX or LINUX.
Sorry MS, nice try!
Posted by Wolf Schneider, 31 Jul 2007