.
/v3-uk/news/1944727/bpi-tough-carphone-warehouse
07 Apr 2008, Iain Thomson , V3
The British Phonographic Institute (BPI) has threatened Carphone Warehouse with legal action if it fails to cut off people whom the BPI claims are downloading music illegally.
Carphone Warehouse, which owns TalkTalk, was the first ISP to state publicly that it would not enforce the BPI's so-called three strikes policy whereby persistent illegal music downloaders would have their internet connections cut.
The BPI has proposed a scheme under which its investigators will visit P2P sites and harvest information on the user from the data that they make available, including IP addresses.
This information is then fed to the ISP, which is supposed to send a warning letter as a first step.
If it occurs again the user gets a second letter and their access is suspended until they acknowledge the warning. A third offence would see the user cut off.
Carphone Warehouse boss Charles Dunstone has declared that he will not co-operate with the scheme.
Dunstone called the move an intrusion into user privacy, and described it as similar to prosecuting a bus company just because a shoplifter used the bus.
But this refusal has brought quick action from the BPI. A report in The Daily Telegraph claims that Dunstone has been threatened with legal action unless he signs up to the BPI plan.
"Unless we receive your agreement in writing that within 14 days Carphone Warehouse will implement procedures set out above, we reserve our right to apply to court for injunctions and other relief without further notice to protect our members' rights," BPI chief executive Geoff Taylor said in a fax.
"They have been quite heavy-handed in way they have threatened us," said Dunstone.
"They are trying to position this as 'we are friendly and we all want to work together,' but they are threatening legal action in their first letter to me."
Do you agree?
BPI - Heavy handed
I think the BPI are being unreasonable and heavy handed. Their tactic of threatening legal action strikes of bullying and will ultimately rebound against them.
Posted by Slingsby, 11 Apr 2008
Home Taping is killing music ...
Remember that campaign by the record industry?
We all know that it didn't kill music of course. Quite the reverse. I wonder why the BPI didn't threaten to take the BBC to court for broadcasting the music which I and others taped off air?
Posted by Jim, 07 Apr 2008
How can they tell
How does anyone know what you are downloading?
It is my understanding that Phorm isn't being used yet (questions about it's legality) and ISP's don't monitor what sites you are viewing or what you are downloading.
So how can a 3-strike policy be implemented, maybe someone could explain?
Posted by Perry, 08 Apr 2008
B.P.I
i am so angry at how the B.P.I. feel they have the right to snoop on our privacy. im sure this is a breach of human rights and im sure someone will stand up to them shortly.
Posted by re.kimmons, 07 Apr 2008
BPI
I agree with Mr. Dunstone,and I find BPI's snooping appalling. If BPI know who these copiers are why don't they take court action action against them direct.There is enough illegal snooping on the interent already without the likes of BPI being able to do it legally should it be proved possible.
Posted by Charles Heaven, 07 Apr 2008
BPI should put its money where its mouth is
The BPI has a good point I guess but the ability to impose penalties, albeit indirectly, should be matched with a responsibility for compensation where they (inevitably) get it wrong. Perhaps a fixed compensatory payment of £10000 where they defame an individual, because that is what it is, would be a validation of their position.
Posted by Phil Hegarty, 07 Apr 2008