.
/v3-uk/news/1944680/idf-intel-predicts-artificial-intelligence
22 Aug 2008, Iain Thomson , V3
Intel's chief technology officer has predicted that humans will create computers smarter than themselves within the next 40 years.
Speaking at the final keynote of the Intel Developer Forum Justin Rattner said that the company, currently celebrating its 40th birthday, would create true artificial intelligence by 2048.
"In that time, machines from Intel will surpass human intelligence," he said.
"And progress in the next 100 years will be more like the progress of the past 20,000 years because of technology."
However, there are significant problems ahead in the short and long term and Intel outlined some of the solutions it is researching.
Dr Mike Garner, programme manager for Intel's emerging materials group, explained that CMOS technology still has a way to go, certainly to 32nm.
"We will need new materials to improve transistor performance and new technologies like tri-gate transistors which give more power, lower leakage and better density," he said.
"CMOS will be the platform [of the processor] and then we will have other things on top of that."
These would involve a possible switch from binary logic systems when quantum computers finally come online.
Intel is also working on signalling. Rattner demonstrated a photonic system that has a laser built onto a silicon chip sending data at 3.2Gbps down optical cable.
Intel scientists are working on a chip that has 20 such lasers, capable of data rates of up to 1Tbps.
Power will also be an issue. Rattner demonstrated how power could be beamed to a device wirelessly, albeit with a 25 per cent loss from just a few feet. He envisioned offices without cables, and possibly the end of the battery.
Jan Rabaey, the Donald O. Pederson Distinguished Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences at the University of California at Berkeley, then discussed how wireless devices could be improved.
Two techniques were suggested: cognitive radio and collaboration. The first would analyse the spectrum and switch to the best available option. This would lead to the freeing up of large amounts of spectrum for mobile connectivity.
Meanwhile, wireless devices would also have to learn to work together in the future. "Wireless radios do not work together, in fact they fight each other," said Rabaey.
"If they could work together the system is more efficient and you would save energy. The Federal Communications Commission is looking actively at experiments in this space."
Do you agree?
AI in 40 years...
roodly: what did you smoke?!
politely: present/current supercomputers do NOT have IQ of Bee...
so, it's very irresponcible to say something like that.
abviosly person do NOT have ANY idea what he is talking about.
(sorry, this is as polite as I can do.)
Posted by 31415926, 23 Aug 2008
Ethics and - on experiential status of developed AI systems
A great matter resting on the crux of actual awareness of synthetic "minds" which seems a prerequisite to true AI regards the matter of what the hardware can accomplish in high performance calculating which seems to give rise to no type of sense of experience of which biological life requires stemming from chemicals and sophisticated cellular systems. Should a phenomenally powerful calculator achieve a type of sentience, yes. but would it achieve a type of awareness or sense of experience and in essence think and possess a sense of reality and sense i think reqires coupling with other processes or systems akin to our neural messengers and hormones. A giant calculator may eventually mimic and effectively carry out intelligent processes, but for an awareness and thus possessing a true mind mere logical processess carried out in nanoseconds on sophisticated hardware i wonder if yet a mind would make. also, what kind of experience would such a device possess and is it ethically proper to entrap an existential being with capacity for sensitive sentience in the confines of a large calculator. Our sense of being hinges upon multiple biological platforms running in sync. Would smarter than human machines be possible without a sense of personal identity or awareness i think yes, but artificial sensitive sentience is only possible i think when the physics of chemical properties have been synthesized, but wouldn't it be easier and more efficient to utilize the actual thing rather than finding more and more efficient ways to configure electrical computaions. I think it's essentially asking whether or not an electrical current can be manipulated sufficiently to give it a mind, yes? solely or in conjunction with other physical systems...i only wonder if purely electrical impulses can gain a sense of experience or existential state and if so would it be desirable to experience that state, also there is the matter of what exactly possesses this artificial mind, the electricity or the hardware, and how the hell can running electricity through circuits or logic gates ever give rise to a mind capable of actual existential being or sense thereof, i do not believe that is possible, the state of the physical properties of the systems must run parallel and relative to others for a feedback to occur in a synthesized type of loop... i think i wonder if i deconstructed a house and manipulated it in a way to carry out ridiculously complex tasks, it may mimic having chemical messengers to perform the properties of intelligence, but it is not the possessor of intelligence, it is an intelligent system, and fortunately for where we are now and our current modern world ethical zeitgeist, it is beneficial for the sensitively sentient beings that they do not exist as a phenomenally powerful calculator
Posted by Paul Warren, 29 Jun 2009