Novell's new SuSE Linux client OS has a number of improvements, but migration costs are high
High migration costs holding back Linux
/v3-uk/news/1942169/high-migration-costs-holding-linux
04 Apr 2006, Robert Jaques , V3
Novell's newly developed SuSE Linux client operating system has an improved user interface and features, but the high cost of migrating from Windows remains a major barrier to uptake, according to Gartner.
The warning comes after Novell's demonstration last week of the next version of its Linux client operating system, SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) 10, which it plans to ship during the third quarter of this year.
The demonstration coincidentally occurred the day after Microsoft announced a delay in the shipment of Windows Vista.
"Although this Linux operating system is much improved over previous versions, the cost of migrating Windows applications remains the main barrier to widespread enterprise adoption," said Michael A. Silver, vice president and research director at Gartner Research.
However, the analyst pointed out that SLED 10 has many new features which enterprises are likely to find attractive, including integrated desktop search, support for popular virtual private network clients and the inclusion of OpenOffice.org 2.0.2.
Novell has enhanced OpenOffice.org 2.0.2 with licensed fonts and Visual Basic for Applications macro conversion.
Gartner also pointed to improved plug-and-play for USB and Bluetooth devices as major steps forward for the Linux distro.
Silver explained that the most visible change in SLED 10 is a new user interface, which is similar to Macintosh and Windows Vista. "Compared with the new one, previous Linux user interfaces felt 'grafted on'," he said.
Included in the new interface are live icons during task switching, improved window animation, transparent frames and multiple desktops that make the screen appear like a 3D cube when switching between them," Silver said.
Gartner noted that to get the most from the new features Novell recommends a minimum 915 chipset.
Vista's graphics requirements are reportedly heavier for its more advanced features, although the forthcoming operating system is likely to include features not offered by Novell in SLED 10.
"SLED 10 is a positive step in the evolution of desktop Linux. But it will not run Windows applications, which means that migration costs will be high for users who require access to many Windows applications," said Silver.
Gartner advises enterprises to consider SLED 10 for users who have very limited Windows compatibility needs, adding that Linux is still "unlikely to be suitable for all users".
"If you choose SLED 10, be prepared to classify users and support more desktop diversity," the analyst firm warned.
Companies should also factor in Novell's annual maintenance fee for access to security fixes for any business cases they develop.
"Expect Novell's version of OpenOffice.org to be suitable for more users. But it is too early to determine its level of compatibility and fidelity with enterprise Excel applications and complex Word documents," said Silver.
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2010, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093
Do you agree?
Gartner
I wonder how much Gartner were being paid by Microsoft to water down the amazing steps forward that Novell have made.
Firstly, as far as Microsoft's Office being the major software focus in business today, the switch to OpenOffice is virtually negligible & anyone who has used both knows this to be true. As stated by many users in the past, very few utilise the top-end of the feature-list from these products & everything else is available & works perfectly.
By the way, this top-end feature-list is not worth the difference in price nor is the rest of the product. Whilst computers have dropped remakably in cost, this software which is 90% based on the old software with a few updates along the way increases in cost regularly.
Using the product is just that - productive & is so immediately because everything is recognisable & anything that isn't can be found very quickly almost more quickly & more appropriately positioned than in Office products.
As far as building new software to fit the specific requirements, then unless it's a very small house that updates only once in a while, the cost of converting the software if written in HTML, XML, C, C++, Ruby, Python, or Java, will more than likely not compare to the ongoing costs of software updating Windows with bug-fixes, virus/worm updates, server updates etc. The fact is that server-wise Windows can't compete with Linux & they know it. They just don't want you to know it.
Do yourselves a favour & swap over. Linux is easy to use now, almost no harder than a multi-user Windows box but far more efficient, secure & reliable.
Posted by Rex Alfie Lee, 06 Apr 2006
Cost of Change
While we live in a dynamically changing technical world, there are many many office people who struggle with the computer on their desk. A large number know how to turn it on, to log onto a system, and do the task for which they were hired. For these people, and in many companies, they are the majority, a change is difficult to ajust to, particularly when it is caused by an outside influence. That is the migration cost to overcome.
Posted by Leslie Satenstein, 06 Apr 2006
Gartner (Gates) group
My what a suprise anouncement
from our friends at Gartner.
No surprises here, not worth
the read.
Posted by Mark G., 04 Apr 2006