The experimental phase for social networks is over. It's time to show a viable business model, analyst firm In-Stat claimed.
Services like Myspace, Linkedin and Facebook have had a fun time signing up users, but now the time has come to start making charging those users for premium services or useful advertising.
It can hardly be considered a coincidence that the wake-up call coincides with the high-on-hype Web2.0 expo that is taking place in San Francisco this week. At the event, one of the show's organizers asked a packed keynote room if they considered web2.0 a bubble. To his own surprise, nobody seemed to deny the hype element.
18 Apr 2007
But except for the purpose of hype debunking, why would now be the time for the Web2.0 bubble to burst? The Web1.0 bubble burst because entrepreneurs had lied to investors about their growth and customer base and because investors failed to see that a two year growth trend couldn’t be extrapolated into a larger trend for the overall economy. This fueled a mad rush on talent, equipment and office space that snowballed out of control.
Current web2.0 startups rarely have VC funding, and we haven't seen a single Web2.0 firm go public. Investors aren't fighting for investment opportunities, because except for Myspace and Youtube, the returns have been abysmal. Development meanwhile is done with worldwide teams of a few dozen people, as evidenced by a continuing number of vacancies in the Silicon Valley real estate market.
It doesn't seem that Linkedin or Facebook need to be afraid of In-Stat's doomsday scenario. But then, it wouldn't hurt any Web2.0 service to be profitable either.